Statements (16)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:citation |
[2009] UKSC 14
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:date |
2009
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Regina v Horncastle and others
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Lord_Phillips
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
admissibility of hearsay evidence
|
| gptkbp:overruledBy |
European Court of Human Rights decision in Al-Khawaja and Tahery v United Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:principle |
domestic courts not always required to follow Strasbourg jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:significance |
addressed compatibility of UK hearsay rules with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
|
| gptkbp:subject |
criminal evidence law
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:UK_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v Horncastle (2009)
|