Statements (21)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:appliesTo |
gptkb:Jersey
England and Wales |
| gptkbp:category |
criminal law case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
[2005] UKPC 23
|
| gptkbp:date |
2005
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Regina v Holley
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
objective test for loss of control
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v Holley
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Parliament_of_the_United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
England and Wales
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
provocation
diminished responsibility |
| gptkbp:overruledBy |
R v Smith (Morgan) [2001] UKHL 49
|
| gptkbp:panelType |
Privy Council (9 judges)
|
| gptkbp:predecessor |
provocation defence in homicide cases
|
| gptkbp:significance |
clarified law on provocation
|
| gptkbp:subject |
gptkb:murder
manslaughter |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Law_Lords
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|