Statements (26)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:citation |
[2003] 3 WLR 1060
[2003] 4 All ER 765 [2003] UKHL 50 [2004] 1 AC 1034 |
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:date |
2003-10-16
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:House_of_Lords
|
| gptkbp:factsOfCase |
Two boys, aged 11 and 12, set fire to newspapers which spread to a building, causing £1 million in damage.
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
R v G [2003] UKHL 50
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
Subjective recklessness is required for criminal damage
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Changed the law on recklessness from an objective to a subjective standard.
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Lord_Bingham
gptkb:Lord_Steyn gptkb:Lord_Walker gptkb:Lord_Hutton Lord Rodger |
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
gptkb:crime
recklessness |
| gptkbp:overruledBy |
gptkb:R_v_Caldwell
|
| gptkbp:plotSummary |
R v G is a leading case in English criminal law that redefined the test for recklessness in criminal damage.
|
| gptkbp:principle |
A person acts recklessly if he is aware of a risk and it is unreasonable to take it.
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:British_criminal_law
gptkb:Law_Lords |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v G
|