Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:area |
Aboriginal law
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
used in law school curricula
analyzed in legal textbooks |
| gptkbp:case_number |
23700
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
unanimous decision
appeal dismissed affirmed lower court's ruling influenced policy changes led to further legal challenges recognized in international law discussions contributed to legal reforms in Canada impact on Indigenous sovereignty discussions shaped public policy regarding Indigenous rights upheld Indigenous rights influenced government negotiations with Indigenous groups |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for Indigenous rights advocacy
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Ottawa,_Ontario
|
| gptkbp:cultural_impact |
recognized in Indigenous communities
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
Justice L' Heureux-Dubé
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
1996-04-18
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Canadian Indigenous rights
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. Van der Peet
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced subsequent Aboriginal rights cases
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
gptkb:Constitution_Act,_1982
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
[1996] 2 S. C. R. 507
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
majority opinion by Justice Mc Lachlin
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
reviewed by legal scholars
examined in legal critiques review of lower court decision |
| gptkbp:key_issues |
definition of Aboriginal rights
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
interpreted in various legal contexts
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
part of constitutional law discussions
part of Canadian legal framework shaped Indigenous law interpretation |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
clarified legal tests
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
continuity of practices
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
lawyers for The Queen
lawyers for Van der Peet |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Indian_Act
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:R_v._Gladstone
established legal precedent for future Aboriginal rights litigation |
| gptkbp:propulsion |
Van der Peet
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
significant public interest
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:R_v._Sparrow
gptkb:R_v._Kapp |
| gptkbp:responds_to |
gptkb:The_Queen
|
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
discussed in law journals
|
| gptkbp:significance |
established test for Aboriginal rights
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:R_v._Sparrow
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|