|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
dismissed
misdirection
|
|
gptkbp:area
|
criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
law students
legal scholars
criminal law evolution
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
gptkb:murder
gptkb:N/_A
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
guilty verdict
conviction upheld
important for legal history
influenced future rulings
affirmed conviction
majority opinion delivered
affirmed by judges
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
influenced legal standards
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
appeal case
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
criminal defenses
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Court_of_King's_Bench
gptkb:John_Smith
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
Lord Chief Justice Tindal
|
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
early 19th century legal system
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
R v. Smith (1830)
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
self-defense laws
|
|
gptkbp:influenced_by
|
common law principles
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
legal textbooks
(1830) 10 B & C 1
|
|
gptkbp:judged_by
|
1830-01-15
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
gptkb:majority_opinion
yes
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
19th century England
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
gptkb:crown
self-defense claim
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
upheld conviction
conviction affirmed by court
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
self-defense
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:lawyer
|
|
gptkbp:notable_for
|
interpretation of intent
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
conviction
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
yes
subsequent cases
established in this case
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
gptkb:murder
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
established precedent
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
1830-01-01
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
1830
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:William_Garrow_Jr.
gptkb:The_King's_Bench
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|