Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:area |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
C-12345 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
appeal allowed
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. S. (M.)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_McLachlin
gptkb:Justice_Sopinka Justice L'Heureux-Dubé Supreme_Court_review |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
fair trial rights
presumption of innocence standard of proof right to counsel admissibility of evidence |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
defendant represented by counsel
prosecution_represented_by_Crown_counsel |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Canadian_legal_system
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
landmark decision
reviewed by legal scholars debated in legal forums discussed in law journals used in law school curricula influenced legal reforms cited in legal arguments analyzed in legal textbooks discussed in criminal law courses referenced in legal precedents discussed in public policy debates [1991] 1 S.C.R. 1 examined in moot court competitions analyzed for constitutional implications analyzed for evidentiary standards analyzed for its implications on justice system cited in appellate court decisions examined for human rights implications referenced in legal training materials reviewed for procedural fairness studied for its impact on legal ethics |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction overturned
new trial ordered retrial ordered |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future rulings
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:R_v._Oakes
R_v._Stinchcombe |
| gptkbp:research |
documentary evidence
testimonial evidence |
| gptkbp:significance |
precedent for similar cases
|
| gptkbp:year |
1991
|