|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
successful appeal
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
reasonable force
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
ongoing legal debates
influenced future rulings
impact on legal standards
self-defense justification
homeowners' rights
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
gptkb:Assassin
2001/2245
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
legal reform discussions
reduced sentence
revised legal standards
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
influenced self-defense laws
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:casualties
|
intruder
|
|
gptkbp:charging_method
|
gptkb:murder
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Tony_Martin
gptkb:Court_of_Appeal_(Criminal_Division)
gptkb:farmers
fear for life
pleaded not guilty
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2001
|
|
gptkbp:defendant's_action
|
shot intruder
|
|
gptkbp:defendant's_residence
|
gptkb:Norfolk
|
|
gptkbp:duration
|
several years
highly complex
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
R v. Martin (2001)
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
public perception of self-defense
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
[2001] EWCA Crim 2245
|
|
gptkbp:judged_by
|
revised interpretation of self-defense
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Lord_Justice_Auld
gptkb:Lord_Justice_Latham
gptkb:Lord_Justice_Judge
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
burglary
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
proportionality of response
debate on self-defense
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
retrial ordered
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
self-defense
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:lawyer
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
high-profile case
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
conviction quashed
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
legal precedent for self-defense cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
controversial case
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:R_v._Clegg
|
|
gptkbp:related_event
|
home invasion
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
self-defense law
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:R_v._D_(2006)
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|