Statements (111)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:area |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
unreasonable delay
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
used in law schools
analysis of the ruling study in legal efficiency analyzed for future legal strategies analyzed for implications on justice system |
| gptkbp:case_documentation_importance |
important for legal education
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:2016_SCC_27
documented in legal archives history of the case details of the case 36799 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:majority_opinion
unanimous decision retrial ordered reviewed by appellate courts significant for defendants' rights overturned lower court ruling findings of the court emphasized timely justice significant for legal precedents. outcome of the appeal affects accused individuals found systemic issues in trial delays influenced public perception of justice system repercussions for legal practitioners |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
landmark ruling
critical for legal practitioners landmark ruling on trial delays |
| gptkbp:case_study_importance |
important for understanding legal rights
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
appeal case |
| gptkbp:consequences |
influenced future cases
implications for defendants implications for future trials affects judicial administration impacts on future prosecutions increased scrutiny of court delays |
| gptkbp:context |
criminal proceedings
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:court_procedure |
court procedures affected
|
| gptkbp:court's_rationale |
explained need for timely trials
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Canada
|
| gptkbp:defendant_rights |
right to a fair trial
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
dissenting opinion by some justices
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. Jordan
|
| gptkbp:impact |
court efficiency
right to a timely trial |
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
gptkb:R_v._Morin
previous cases |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
often referenced in legal discussions
numerous subsequent cases frequently referenced in legal arguments [2016] 1 S. C. R. 631 |
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
reasonable time for trial
Jordan test |
| gptkbp:judged_by |
July 8, 2016
unanimous decision |
| gptkbp:judges |
Justices of the Supreme Court
Justices Mc Lachlin, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon, Côté, Brown |
| gptkbp:judicial_expectations |
set new standards for trial processes
|
| gptkbp:judicial_guidelines |
established for trial timelines
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
reviewed by legal scholars
review of trial delays |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Canadian legal system
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
framework for legal proceedings
ensuring fair trial rights impact on judicial system framework for assessing delays influenced judicial conduct revised standards for trial delays shifted focus to trial efficiency |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
debate on trial timelines
public interest in prosecution sparked discussions on trial efficiency |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
changed legal landscape
case dismissed reform of trial delay standards redefined expectations for trial duration |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
reasonable delay
Jordan framework |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:lawyer
analysis of delay analyzed for implications on civil rights |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Criminal_Code_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
charges stayed due to delay
reform of trial timelines |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:R_v._Askov
affects future criminal cases important legal precedent right to a timely trial established judicial precedent new standards for trial delays time limits for trial delays |
| gptkbp:propulsion |
gptkb:Jordan
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
mixed reactions
significant media coverage |
| gptkbp:reform |
prompted changes in judicial practices
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:R_v._Cody
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
section 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms |
| gptkbp:responds_to |
gptkb:The_Queen
R v. Jordan's case |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
extensively analyzed in legal literature
|
| gptkbp:significance |
established new framework for determining unreasonable delay in criminal trials
established new trial timelines |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2016
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|