Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:appeal_result |
dismissed
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
misdirection by trial judge
defendant's appeal against conviction |
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
still cited in legal arguments
discussed in law textbooks used in law school curricula affects understanding of consent in law frequently referenced in legal debates important in legal discussions |
| gptkbp:case_number |
[1998] EWCA Crim 3030
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
consent cannot justify harm
consent does not negate harm focused on public interest highlighted issues of personal autonomy legal clarity on consent issues |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
influenced public perception of consent
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
|
| gptkbp:charging_method |
assault occasioning actual bodily harm
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
set precedent for future cases
influenced law reform discussions |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
David Emmett argued for legality of actions caused injury consent was given reaffirmed limits of consent |
| gptkbp:defendant's_appeal_argument |
misinterpretation of consent
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. Emmett
|
| gptkbp:impact |
clarified legal standards for consent
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
[1999] 2 Cr App R 1
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
February 1999
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lord_Justice_Otton
gptkb:Lord_Justice_Thorpe gptkb:Lord_Justice_Stuart-Smith |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
examined by legal scholars
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
sexual offenses
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
examined in human rights context
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
analyzed in legal journals
validity of consent |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
upheld conviction for assault
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
consent in criminal law
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
defense counsel
prosecution counsel |
| gptkbp:legislation |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:England
|
| gptkbp:notable_for |
discussion on consent and harm
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases on consent
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:R_v._Donovan
gptkb:R_v._Brown |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on consent in sexual offenses
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1999
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:R_v._Brown
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|