R (on the application of B)
GPTKB entity
Statements (116)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
gptkb:Judicial_Review
|
| gptkbp:area |
gptkb:Administrative_Law
gptkb:immigration |
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Used as a case study in law schools.
Implications for administrative law. Analysis of case references. Analysis of the case by legal scholars. Analysis of the case study. Analysis of the outcome's significance. Details of the case analysis provided. Implications for the legal system. |
| gptkbp:case_documentation_analysis |
Analysis of the case documentation.
|
| gptkbp:case_documentation_details |
Details of the case documentation available.
|
| gptkbp:case_documentation_impact |
Impact of the case documentation discussed.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Documentation of the case is available.
Part of a series of cases on detention. [2009] UKSC 3 [2008] UKHL 35 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Details of the court's decision.
Details of the implications for the legal system. Details of the outcome analysis. Details of the outcome were published. Details of the outcome's impact. Details of the significance of the outcome. Findings of the court were significant. Impact on similar future cases. Outcome affected many similar cases. Reviewed in legal journals. Reviewed in legal literature. Ruling provided clarity on detention laws. Significance of the outcome discussed. Summary of the case outcome. The court ruled on the legality of the detention. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome_impact_analysis |
Analysis of the outcome's impact.
|
| gptkbp:case_reference_details |
Details of case references available.
|
| gptkbp:case_reference_impact |
Impact of case references discussed.
|
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Significant for administrative law.
Details on the significance of the case. Significance of case references discussed. Significance of the case documentation discussed. Significance of the case study discussed. |
| gptkbp:case_study_details |
Details of the case study published.
|
| gptkbp:case_study_impact |
Impact of the case study discussed.
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Public law case.
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Affected future cases on detention.
Consequences for the Secretary of State. Implications for future detention cases. |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:UK_Supreme_Court
gptkb:London |
| gptkbp:court_analysis |
Analysis of the court's reasoning.
|
| gptkbp:court_findings_analysis |
Analysis of the court's findings.
|
| gptkbp:court_findings_details |
Details of the court's findings.
|
| gptkbp:court_findings_impact |
Impact of the court's findings discussed.
|
| gptkbp:court_findings_significance |
Significance of the court's findings discussed.
|
| gptkbp:court_judgment |
Judgment was widely discussed.
|
| gptkbp:court_judgment_analysis |
Analysis of the judgment's reasoning.
|
| gptkbp:court_judgment_details |
Details of the judgment were published.
|
| gptkbp:court_judgment_impact |
Impact of the judgment discussed.
|
| gptkbp:court_outcome_details |
Details of the court's outcome.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:UK_Supreme_Court
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
There were dissenting opinions in the judgment.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R (on the application of B)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced subsequent legal interpretations
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
B and Secretary of State for Justice
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department
Secretary of State for Justice |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Frequently referenced in legal arguments.
[2009] UKSC 3 |
| gptkbp:judged_by |
February 4, 2009
|
| gptkbp:judgment_details |
Detailed judgment provided by the court.
|
| gptkbp:judgment_summary |
The judgment summarized the legal principles.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Unlawful detention
Reviewed by higher courts. Challenged the legality of the decision. |
| gptkbp:key_issues |
Lawfulness of detention
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Analysis of the legal context.
Context of immigration law. Details of the legal context provided. Impact of the legal context discussed. Significance of the legal context discussed. |
| gptkbp:legal_context_impact_analysis |
Analysis of the impact of the legal context.
|
| gptkbp:legal_discussion |
Discussed in legal forums.
|
| gptkbp:legal_discussion_details |
Details of the legal discussion available.
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Analysis of the legal framework.
Analysis of the impact of the legal framework. Details of the legal framework discussed. Impact of the legal framework discussed. Part of the legal framework for detention. Significance of the legal framework discussed. The court ruled in favor of B. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Arguments presented by both parties.
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Summary of the legal outcome.
B's detention was found to be unlawful. Details of the legal outcome analysis. Details of the legal outcome were analyzed. Impact of the legal outcome discussed. Significance of the legal outcome discussed. |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Principle of legality
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
B was represented by a barrister
Legal analysis of the judgment. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Judgment in favor of B
judgment in favor of B |
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent immigration cases
Sets precedent for future cases Established important legal precedent. Analysis of the established precedent. Details on the established precedent. |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:human_rights
gptkb:Human_Rights_Act_1998 |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on immigration policy
Impact on judicial review Important for human rights law. |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2008
gptkb:2009 |