R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	December 4, 1991
gptkbp:citation	505 U.S. 377
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Byron_White gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkbp:date	June 22, 1992
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:docketNumber	90-7675
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:R.A.V.,_Petitioner_v._City_of_St._Paul,_Minnesota
gptkbp:heldBy	The St. Paul Bias-Motivated Crime Ordinance is unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
gptkbp:joinedBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:William_Rehnquist gptkb:David_Souter gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkbp:location	gptkb:St._Paul,_Minnesota
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkbp:predecessor	First Amendment jurisprudence
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:United_States_Constitution hate crime laws
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:First_Amendment freedom of speech hate speech
gptkbp:unanimousDecision	true
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkbp:bfsLayer	5
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul