gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
analyzed by legal experts
relevant to current free speech debates
implications for internet regulation
|
gptkbp:case_critiques
|
criticized by civil liberties groups
|
gptkbp:case_location
|
gptkb:United_States
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
available in legal databases
00-1003
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
gptkb:majority_opinion
resolved
upheld lower court ruling
influenced public policy discussions
dissenting opinion
details of the ruling
|
gptkbp:case_reviews
|
reviewed by law scholars
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
gptkb:cultural_landmark
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
civil rights case
arguments presented by Mc Callum
arguments presented by Pryor
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
influenced future cases
shaped online speech regulations
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
April 12, 2001
|
gptkbp:duration
|
approximately 1 year
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Pryor vs. Mc Callum IV
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Pryor
gptkb:Mc_Callum
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
No. 00-1003
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith
Judge Johnson
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal jurisdiction
|
gptkbp:legacy
|
legacy in First Amendment law
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
First Amendment jurisprudence
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
First Amendment rights
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
Mc Callum's attorney
Pryor's attorney
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
gptkb:Communications_Decency_Act
|
gptkbp:material
|
origin of the dispute
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
affirmed
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
freedom of speech
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
controversial ruling
|
gptkbp:publications
|
published in legal journals
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Pryor_v._United_States
|
gptkbp:scholarly_analysis
|
analyzed in law reviews
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on free speech laws
|
gptkbp:sound
|
March 15, 2001
|
gptkbp:subsequent_appeals
|
no further appeals
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Aaron_Pryor
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|