Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Aaron_Pryor
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil rights case
available in legal databases 00-1003 arguments presented by Mc Callum arguments presented by Pryor |
| gptkbp:consequences |
influenced future cases
shaped online speech regulations |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
April 12, 2001
|
| gptkbp:duration |
approximately 1 year
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Pryor vs. Mc Callum IV
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
No. 00-1003
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Pryor
gptkb:Mc_Callum |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith Judge Johnson |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
no further appeals
criticized by civil liberties groups |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
legacy in First Amendment law
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
First Amendment rights
First Amendment jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Mc Callum's attorney
Pryor's attorney |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
gptkb:Communications_Decency_Act |
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:material |
origin of the dispute
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Pryor_v._United_States
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:memorial
gptkb:majority_opinion affirmed resolved analyzed by legal experts upheld lower court ruling influenced public policy discussions dissenting opinion details of the ruling relevant to current free speech debates implications for internet regulation |
| gptkbp:precedent |
freedom of speech
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
controversial ruling
|
| gptkbp:publishes |
published in legal journals
|
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
analyzed in law reviews
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on free speech laws
|
| gptkbp:sound |
March 15, 2001
|
| gptkbp:user_reviews |
reviewed by law scholars
|