Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
19-1234
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 12345
No. 19-1234 |
| gptkbp:controversy |
unlawful search and seizure
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
majority opinion public safety concerns Pryor search was reasonable based on established law search was justified |
| gptkbp:date |
March 15, 2020
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
stop and frisk
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
gptkb:United_States
Pryor |
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
appealed from district court
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
arrest for drug possession
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Pryor v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
law_enforcement_practices
|
| gptkbp:judges |
none
Judges_Smith,_Johnson,_and_Lee |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
reasonable suspicion
Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
impact on civil liberties
Public_Defender's_Office |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
constitutional law
exclusionary rule search and seizure laws totality of circumstances |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
affects future cases
examines police conduct affects constitutional rights influences judicial interpretations influences police procedures involves search incident to arrest no violation of rights found upheld search as constitutional important_for_Fourth_Amendment_cases |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
upheld lower court ruling |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Florida_v._Bostick
guides future law enforcement actions established_Fourth_Amendment_interpretation |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
|
| gptkbp:research |
warrantless search
|
| gptkbp:significance |
important for understanding search laws.
Fourth_Amendment_jurisprudence |