Pruneyard Shopping Center et al. v. Robins et al.
GPTKB entity
Statements (17)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
gptkb:447_U.S._74
|
| gptkbp:date |
1980
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
States may interpret their constitutions to afford broader free speech rights than the federal Constitution, including in privately owned shopping centers.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Pruneyard Shopping Center et al. v. Robins et al.
|
| gptkbp:opinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist
|
| gptkbp:originatedIn |
gptkb:California_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:petitioner |
gptkb:Pruneyard_Shopping_Center
|
| gptkbp:principle |
States can provide greater free speech protections than the federal baseline.
|
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:Robins
|
| gptkbp:subject |
free speech
property rights state constitutional law |
| gptkbp:unanimousDecision |
true
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Pruneyard_Shopping_Center_v._Robins
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|