Powell et al. v. State of Alabama
GPTKB entity
Statements (18)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:alsoKnownAs |
gptkb:Powell_v._Alabama
|
| gptkbp:arguedDate |
1932-10-10
|
| gptkbp:citation |
287 U.S. 45
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
1932-11-07
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
98
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
gptkb:Ozie_Powell,_Willie_Roberson,_Andy_Wright,_Olen_Montgomery,_Eugene_Williams,_and_Haywood_Patterson_v._State_of_Alabama
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
Defendants in capital cases have a right to counsel under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Powell et al. v. State of Alabama
|
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:George_Sutherland
|
| gptkbp:predecessor |
right to counsel in state criminal trials
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Scottsboro_Boys
|
| gptkbp:subject |
due process
right to counsel |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Powell_v._Alabama
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|