Pierce v. Society of Sisters

GPTKB entity

Statements (32)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate 1925-03-17
1925-03-16
gptkbp:category 1925 in United States case law
United States Supreme Court cases of the Taft Court
United States education case law
gptkbp:challenge Oregon Compulsory Education Act of 1922
gptkbp:citation 268 U.S. 510
gptkbp:date 1925-06-01
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant gptkb:State_of_Oregon
gptkb:Walter_M._Pierce
gptkbp:fullName Pierce, Governor of Oregon, et al. v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary
gptkbp:heldBy Oregon's Compulsory Education Act is unconstitutional as it interferes with the liberty of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Pierce v. Society of Sisters
gptkbp:impact affirmed the right of private schools to operate
expanded the doctrine of substantive due process
gptkbp:legalBasis gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkbp:location gptkb:Oregon,_United_States
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:James_Clark_McReynolds
gptkbp:originatedIn gptkb:Oregon
gptkbp:plaintiff Hill Military Academy
Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary
gptkbp:principle parents have the right to choose private or religious schools for their children
states cannot force children to attend only public schools
gptkbp:relatedTo gptkb:Meyer_v._Nebraska
gptkbp:subject education law
parental rights
substantive due process
gptkbp:unanimousDecision true
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Lochner_era
gptkbp:bfsLayer 7