Statements (66)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
3:09-cv-02292-VRW
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Influence on public policy
Increased political activism Increased visibility for LGBTQ issues Influence on state laws Shift in public opinion Struck down Proposition 8 Impact on family law Federal court ruling Legal recognition of same-sex couples Impact on educational rights for children of same-sex couples Cultural shift regarding marriage equality Debate on marriage definition District Court ruling Engagement of religious groups Foundation for future legal battles Impact on adoption rights Impact on future legislation regarding marriage. Impact on healthcare rights for couples Impact on immigration rights for couples Impact on inheritance rights for couples Impact on pension rights for couples Impact on political candidates' platforms Impact on public perception of LGBTQ families Impact on social security benefits for couples Impact on spousal rights in legal matters Impact on tax benefits for couples Impact on workplace rights for couples Influence on federal laws Influence on international LGBTQ rights Inspiration for other lawsuits Legal challenges to similar laws Mobilization of advocacy groups |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Civil rights case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
California marriage law
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
August 4, 2010
|
| gptkbp:events |
Supreme Court involvement
Appeal to Ninth Circuit |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
gptkb:LGBT_rights_movement
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Perry v. Schwarzenegger
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Kristin_Perry
gptkb:Gavin_Newsom gptkb:David_Boies gptkb:Arnold_Schwarzenegger gptkb:Charles_Cooper |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Vaughn_Walker
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Constitutional review
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Proposition_8
gptkb:Equal_protection_clause Due process clause |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:American_Foundation_for_Equal_Rights
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:California_Proposition_8
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
High-profile case
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Unconstitutional ruling
Legalization of same-sex marriage in California |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Obergefell_v._Hodges
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Support for same-sex marriage
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Hollingsworth_v._Perry
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Landmark ruling
Same-sex marriage rights |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Hollingsworth_v._Perry
gptkb:The_American_Foundation_for_Equal_Rights |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|