|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:law
|
|
gptkbp:area
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
gptkb:tax_law
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
[1992] 3 All ER 42
[1992] 3 WLR 1032
[1993] AC 593
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
26 November 1992
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
Pepper and others v Hart and another
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Pepper v Hart
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
changed rules on admissibility of parliamentary materials
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Lord_Bridge_of_Harwich
gptkb:Lord_Griffiths
gptkb:Lord_Keith_of_Kinkel
gptkb:Lord_Templeman
gptkb:House_of_Lords
gptkb:Lord_Browne-Wilkinson
gptkb:Lord_Oliver_of_Aylmerton
Lord Mackay of Clashfern
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
England and Wales
|
|
gptkbp:key
|
Hansard may be consulted in interpreting ambiguous legislation
|
|
gptkbp:legalCitation
|
[1993] AC 593 (HL)
|
|
gptkbp:notableFor
|
allowing reference to parliamentary debates in court
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
Davis v Johnson
|
|
gptkbp:party
|
gptkb:John_Hart
Raymond Pepper
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
use of legislative history in UK courts
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
use of Hansard in statutory interpretation
|
|
gptkbp:relatedConcept
|
gptkb:Hansard
statutory interpretation
extrinsic materials
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
Davis v Johnson
Fothergill v Monarch Airlines Ltd
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:tax_law
statutory interpretation
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Law_Lords
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|