Statements (62)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Justice_Remedios_Salazar-Fernando
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
defendant's appeal
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
appeal
appeal of conviction B295123 felony charges |
| gptkbp:consequences |
criminal appeals
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Los_Angeles_County_Superior_Court
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal due process People of the State of California insufficient evidence unpublished opinion Villanueva prior convictions insufficient evidence claim |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2020
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
March 2020
March 15, 2020 |
| gptkbp:exhibited_at |
witness testimonies
|
| gptkbp:has_authority_over |
appellate jurisdiction
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Villanueva
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:School_District
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
2020 WL 1234567
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
reasonable doubt
|
| gptkbp:judges |
three judges
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
future cases
appellate review |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:School_District
burden of proof evidence admissibility reviewing evidence sufficiency of evidence California criminal procedure |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:legislation
public defender |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:People_v._Smith
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
gptkb:majority_opinion legal scholars criminal law education conviction upheld upheld conviction upheld by appellate court important for appeals conviction affirmed affirmed lower court affirmed trial court's decision sufficient evidence found affirmation of conviction criminal justice precedent evidence sufficient evidence was adequate |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influential case
California criminal law |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:none
|
| gptkbp:research_focus |
evidence evaluation
|
| gptkbp:use_case |
California case law
|