Statements (54)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:appeals_to |
defendant's appeal
|
gptkbp:case_analysis |
appellate review
important for legal scholars affects future appeals California case law reference |
gptkbp:case_number |
involves robbery charges
B194123 appealed from trial court criminal conviction appeal |
gptkbp:case_outcome |
evidence was admissible
no retrial ordered majority opinion issued based on trial record sufficient evidence presented no new trial granted |
gptkbp:case_significance |
precedent for future cases
|
gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
|
gptkbp:consequences |
affects defendant's future
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Los_Angeles_County_Superior_Court
gptkb:Robert_Price gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal not guilty misconduct by prosecutor |
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2007
unpublished opinion |
gptkbp:defendant's_rights |
protected under law
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Price
|
gptkbp:impact |
California criminal law
|
gptkbp:involved |
criminal law
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
California Reports
2007 WL 2462153 |
gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
harmless error
|
gptkbp:issues |
evidence admission
|
gptkbp:judged_by |
upheld by court
|
gptkbp:judicial_review |
appellate court review
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
gptkbp:legal_context |
California criminal procedure
|
gptkbp:legal_framework |
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
three judges |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
ineffective assistance of counsel
sufficiency of evidence |
gptkbp:legal_outcome |
conviction upheld
upheld by appellate court |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
due process
|
gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
examines trial procedures |
gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed conviction
|
gptkbp:precedent |
California case law
influences similar cases |
gptkbp:significance |
important for criminal appeals.
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of |
witness testimony
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:New_York_Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|