Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Illinois_Supreme_Court
gptkb:New_York_Supreme_Court gptkb:Blakely_v._Washington |
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:battle
judicial review legal standards appeal legal arguments police procedure evidence evaluation legal implications prosecution strategy court's reasoning final ruling court's decision defendant's actions arrest circumstances evidence discovery E048123 review of search warrant |
| gptkbp:consequences |
guidance on police conduct
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Riverside_County_Superior_Court
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal unlawful search |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2010
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
reasonable expectation of privacy
|
| gptkbp:exhibited_at |
physical evidence
testimonial evidence |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Pineda
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
191 Cal. App.4th 1
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Mc_Kinster
gptkb:Justice_Richli gptkb:Justice_Hollenhorst |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
admissibility of evidence
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
exclusionary rule
search and seizure |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:legislation
public defender application of law |
| gptkbp:material |
drug-related charges
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:People_v._Johnson
gptkb:People_v._Mc_Gowan gptkb:People_v._Williams |
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:award
civil liberties law enforcement practices evidence collection criminal procedure conviction upheld constitutional rights affirmed conviction impact on search and seizure law |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Fourth Amendment rights
|
| gptkbp:propulsion |
gptkb:defendant_Pineda
|
| gptkbp:responds_to |
People of the State of California
|