Statements (62)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Bling_Ring_gang
|
gptkbp:advocates_for |
April 2010
insufficient evidence defendant's appeal |
gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
criminal trial history robbery charges B215123 |
gptkbp:command_structure |
two years imprisonment
|
gptkbp:consequences |
evidence handling
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Katherine_Neiers
gptkb:Los_Angeles_County_Superior_Court gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal not guilty People of the State of California ineffective assistance of counsel protected under law sufficiency of evidence |
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2010
|
gptkbp:doctrine |
harmless error
|
gptkbp:duration |
approximately one year
|
gptkbp:exhibited_at |
circumstantial evidence
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Neiers
|
gptkbp:impact |
future cases
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
2010 WL 1234567
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
criminal law
|
gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
beyond a reasonable doubt
|
gptkbp:judges |
guilty
three judge panel |
gptkbp:judging_criteria |
affirmed
|
gptkbp:judicial_review |
appellate court review
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:School_District
evidence admissibility jury instructions defense's claim of innocence |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
private attorney |
gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:People_v._Smith
|
gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
gptkb:majority_opinion gptkb:legal_case criminal law education conviction upheld upheld conviction appellate review upheld by appellate court evidence was admissible on legal standards precedent for future appeals based on evidence presented conviction affirmed sufficient evidence existed affirmed by appellate court evidence supported conviction based on legal standards |
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:People_v._Johnson
California criminal procedure |
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:none
|
gptkbp:sound |
March 15, 2010
|