Statements (57)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:ACLU_of_Michigan
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
defendant's appeal
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
trial and appeal B197123 facts of the case California legal database |
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
criminal justice reform
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
evidence standards
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Superior_Court_of_California
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal gptkb:Mc_Nair insufficient evidence state attorney |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2008
|
| gptkbp:exhibited_at |
circumstantial evidence
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
held
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Mc Nair
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
2008 WL 2051040
2008 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 4870 |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:judging_criteria |
affirmed
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
evidence evaluation
appellate review appellate court review |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:key_issues |
sufficiency of evidence
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
burden of proof three judges California criminal law error in trial |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:legislation
scholarly articles |
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:majority_opinion
legal scholars criminal law education legal community conviction upheld upheld conviction affirmative ruling conviction confirmed upheld by appellate court precedent for future cases future legal cases affirmed lower court criminal law precedent appellant and respondent sufficient evidence found upheld by California Court of Appeal |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influential case
California case law |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:none
|
| gptkbp:significance |
case law development
|