Statements (65)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Illinois_Supreme_Court
gptkb:New_York_Supreme_Court gptkb:Blakely_v._Washington |
gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
involved jury instructions involved statutory interpretation involved case law analysis involved constitutional issues involved legal arguments involved appeal process involved judicial review involved legal interpretations involved legal precedents involved legal standards involved sentencing issues involved appellate review involved drug charges involved legal outcomes involved legal principles involved witness testimony involved plea negotiations involved robbery charges involved trial procedures involved judicial discretion involved defense strategy A034123 criminal appeal regarding evidence involved evidentiary standards involved jury deliberation involved prosecutorial conduct involved verdict issues |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
appellate court improper evidence admission |
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:1988
|
gptkbp:exhibited_at |
physical evidence
testimonial evidence |
gptkbp:historical_significance |
evidence in criminal trials
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Foster
|
gptkbp:impact |
California criminal law
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
201 Cal. App. 3d 1005
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:defendant_Foster
People of the State of California |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Stein
gptkb:Justice_Kline gptkb:Justice_Rattigan |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
gptkbp:legal_issue |
admissibility of evidence
California criminal procedure harmless error doctrine |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
prosecutor's office |
gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:legal_case
conviction upheld impact on future cases evidence was admissible affirmed conviction upheld lower court's ruling evidence law reforms evidence handling in trials |
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:People_v._Johnson
California evidence law |
gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1988
|