gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
April 2019
insufficient evidence
defendant appealed conviction
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
legal scholars
|
gptkbp:case_classification
|
criminal appeal
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
court records
available online
notable
publicly accessible
B295123
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
gptkb:majority_opinion
legal experts
criminal justice reform
evidence admissibility
not guilty plea
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
gptkb:cultural_landmark
criminal defense rights
|
gptkbp:casualties
|
gptkb:John_Doe
|
gptkbp:clinical_trial
|
two weeks
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
criminal liability
|
gptkbp:convicted_of
|
five years imprisonment
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Los_Angeles_County_Superior_Court
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
gptkb:legal_case
People of the State of California
Dela Cruz
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2020
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:none
|
gptkbp:duration
|
high
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
March 15, 2020
|
gptkbp:events
|
gptkb:Los_Angeles
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
People v. Dela Cruz
|
gptkbp:involved
|
criminal law
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
2020 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1234
|
gptkbp:is_standardized_by
|
beyond a reasonable doubt
|
gptkbp:judged_by
|
affirmed
|
gptkbp:judges
|
guilty
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
appellate court
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:California
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
gptkb:law
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
three judges
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
prosecutorial misconduct
evidentiary rulings
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
precedent setting
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
self-defense
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
public defender
private attorney
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
conviction upheld
|
gptkbp:post-conviction
|
appeal process
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
self-defense cases
California case law
|
gptkbp:public_interest
|
high
|
gptkbp:sound
|
oral arguments
|
gptkbp:strategy
|
self-defense claim
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of
|
witness testimony
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Justice_Remedios_Salazar-Fernando
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|