Statements (60)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:People_v._King
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
defendant's appeal
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
trial court proceedings defendant's actions California appellate decision B164123 |
| gptkbp:consequences |
evidence law
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
unlawful search Jorge Ceballos |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2004
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
exclusionary rule
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Ceballos
|
| gptkbp:impact |
California criminal procedure
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Cal. App. 4th
124 Cal. App.4th 1 |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:judges |
three judges panel
|
| gptkbp:judging_criteria |
affirmed
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
appellate court
appellate review |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:key_issues |
admissibility of evidence
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
gptkb:California_Penal_Code due process search and seizure ineffective assistance of counsel search warrant requirements |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
evidence admissibility |
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:majority_opinion
gptkb:legal_case due process rights conviction upheld affirmed lower court ruling upheld conviction criminal defense evidence evaluation evidence admissible future cases legal precedent established sufficient evidence conviction affirmed no violation of rights affirmation of lower court criminal procedure law California criminal law evidence was lawfully obtained |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:People_v._Mc_Gowan
California case law California legal precedent |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:none
|
| gptkbp:significance |
evidence rules
appellate decisions |
| gptkbp:sound |
oral argument
|
| gptkbp:tactics |
suppression of evidence
|