Statements (64)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Nieves_v._Bartlett
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
07-751
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
January 21, 2009 |
| gptkbp:has_impact_on |
Law enforcement practices
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
November 12, 2008
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Pearson v. Callahan
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Civil rights litigation
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
555 U. S. 223
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:John_Pearson
Callahan |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Qualified immunity
Civil rights under Section 1983 |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Petitioner represented by Jeffrey L. Fisher
Respondent represented by John J. Mc Carthy |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Judicial_review
gptkb:legal_case Civil procedure Public policy Legal history Civil rights violations Constitutional interpretation Case law Statutory interpretation Due process Legal theory Legal frameworks Legal principles Legal ethics Legal precedent Legal interpretation Legal scholarship Legal standards Legal remedies Judicial activism Search and seizure Equal protection Legal analysis Judicial discretion Litigation strategy Legal doctrines Constitutional protections Judicial reasoning Judicial immunity Excessive force Government officials' liability Law enforcement accountability Immunity doctrine Qualified immunity analysis |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States
gptkb:Harlow_v._Fitzgerald Brosseau v. Haugen Ashcroft v. al-Kidd |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Reversed and remanded
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Saucier_v._Katz
Established a two-step analysis for qualified immunity |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified qualified immunity standards
|