|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
March 29, 1977
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
432 U.S. 197
|
|
gptkbp:constitution
|
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 17, 1977
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:William_J._Brennan,_Jr.
gptkb:Lewis_F._Powell,_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not prohibit a state from requiring a defendant to prove the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance by a preponderance of the evidence.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Patterson v. New York
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
due process
burden of proof
affirmative defense
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Byron_White
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Patterson
|
|
gptkbp:politicalParty
|
gptkb:New_York
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:In_re_Winship
Mullaney v. Wilbur
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
gptkb:crime
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Justice_Lewis_F._Powell_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|