|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
gptkb:Oklahoma_Attorney_General
October 2020
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
21-456
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2021
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Doe
gptkb:Justice_Roe
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
20-1234
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
June 2021
|
|
gptkbp:has_implications_for
|
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
civil rights
constitutional law
state law
criminal rights
|
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
gptkb:legal_reforms
legislative changes
judicial interpretations
subsequent cases
preceding cases
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Oklahoma v. Johnson
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
criminal justice reform
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:State_of_Oklahoma
gptkb:Johnson
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
141 S. Ct. 1234
123 U. S. 456
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
gptkb:standard
gptkb:Eighth_Amendment
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:Fifth_Amendment
gptkb:Witness
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment
gptkb:Christian_theology
gptkb:Roman_settlement
gptkb:court_cases
gptkb:legal_case
jurisdiction
judicial review
settlement agreement
witnesses
precedent
appeal
evidence
verdict
oral arguments
briefs
statutory interpretation
amicus curiae
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
due process
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
case studies
commentaries
scholarly articles
public defender
briefs
law reviews
private attorney
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:opinion_by
|
gptkb:Justice_Smith
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
decision in favor of Johnson
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
affects future cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
5-4
controversial
widely discussed
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Oklahoma_v._Smith
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
landmark ruling
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
March 2021
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Oklahoma_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|