Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
influenced future cases
affirmed lower court ruling upheld conviction shaped public policy influenced sentencing guidelines shaped future legal arguments affected public perception of law enforcement influenced international human rights law informed legal education revised legal standards influenced legal scholarship shaped constitutional debates affected appellate review processes affected civil liberties discussions affected civil rights litigation affected constitutional amendments discussions affected constitutional law affected judicial discretion altered defense tactics altered judicial interpretations changed evidentiary rules impacted law enforcement training influenced community relations with police influenced judicial appointments influenced law reform efforts influenced plea bargaining practices informed prosecutorial approaches redefined police procedures shaped law enforcement practices shaped legal advocacy strategies shaped legislative responses to crime |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal law
83-1 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
467 U.S. 431
|
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 decision
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 28, 1984 |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Nix v. Williams
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal procedure
|
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:William_Williams
gptkb:Robert_Nix |
| gptkbp:judges |
Justice Harry Blackmun
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
exclusionary rule
clarified search and seizure laws good faith exception public safety exception Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:outcome |
evidence obtained was admissible
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
inevitable discovery doctrine
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Miranda_v._Arizona
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio |
| gptkbp:research |
physical evidence
testimonial evidence |