Statements (38)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:506_U._S._830
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal procedure
82-201 arose from a robbery investigation |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
1984-06-25 |
| gptkbp:election_year |
6-3
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
1983-11-08
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
New York v. Quarles
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced police training
law enforcement interrogation practices |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
467 U. S. 649
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
New York State and John Quarles
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Rehnquist, White, O' Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Burger
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
Stevens, Blackmun, and Brennan on police interrogation rights |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
changed interrogation protocols immediate threat to public safety public safety exception to Miranda rights |
| gptkbp:legislation |
law enforcement policies
Miranda warnings |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld conviction
affirmed lower court's ruling still cited in legal arguments today important in criminal law Court ruled in favor of New York upheld the use of evidence obtained without Miranda warnings under certain conditions. allowed for certain exceptions to Miranda |
| gptkbp:precedent |
established in 1984
subsequent cases involving Miranda rights |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Miranda_v._Arizona
|
| gptkbp:significance |
established public safety exception
|