New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen
GPTKB entity
Statements (62)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Impact on future gun legislation and court cases.
Reaffirmed the right to carry firearms in public. Reinforced individual rights to bear arms. Significant shift in gun rights jurisprudence. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
20-843
|
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 ruling
Decided by a conservative majority. |
| gptkbp:date |
November 3, 2021
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:futurePlans |
Expected to lead to future litigation on gun rights.
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Subject of numerous legal analyses and discussions.
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Part_of_ongoing_debates_over_gun_control_in_the_U.S.
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
Originated_from_a_challenge_to_New_York's_gun_laws.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:Expanded_gun_rights_in_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:influence |
Influenced changes in state-level gun laws.
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor Justice Stephen Breyer The majority's decision disregards the state's interest in public safety. Expanded the scope of judicial review on gun laws. Impact on judicial approaches to gun regulation. Judicial review of state laws regarding firearms. Reflects_originalist_interpretations_of_the_Constitution. |
| gptkbp:lawEnforcement |
Impact on law enforcement practices regarding firearms.
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:New_York_Attorney_General
gptkb:Paul_Clement Part of the evolving legal framework surrounding gun rights. Established standards for evaluating gun rights. Legal implications for state gun control measures. Set a precedent for evaluating gun regulations. Legal scholars have debated the implications of the ruling. Second_Amendment_rights Second_Amendment_of_the_United_States_Constitution. Focused_on_the_interpretation_of_the_Second_Amendment. |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Extensive media coverage following the decision.
|
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Prompted legislative responses in various states.
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
597 U.S. ___ (2022)
Analyzed in various legal journals. Relevant to ongoing discussions about gun rights. Involved a challenge to the requirement for a concealed carry license. Significant_for_its_interpretation_of_the_Second_Amendment. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Struck_down_New_York's_concealed_carry_law
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:New_York_State
gptkb:New_York_State_Rifle_&_Pistol_Association gptkb:Robert_Nash |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Justice Clarence Thomas
The Second Amendment protects an individual's right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home. Political reactions varied across party lines. |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Future gun rights cases
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Addressed concerns over public safety and gun violence.
Catalyst for public policy debates on gun control. Increased public awareness of gun rights issues. Influenced public discourse on gun ownership. Mixed reactions from gun rights advocates and gun control supporters. |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Caetano_v._Massachusetts
gptkb:McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago gptkb:District_of_Columbia_v._Heller gptkb:NYSRPA_v._City_of_New_York |
| gptkbp:significance |
Influenced state gun laws
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
June 23, 2022
|