Statements (20)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
1933-12-12
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Constitutional
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1934-01-15 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_George_Sutherland
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Nebbia v. New York
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future economic regulation cases
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:291_U._S._502
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Price regulation
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Due process and economic regulation
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Constitution
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Upheld state regulation of milk prices
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent price control cases
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Benjamin_N._Cardozo
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:West_Coast_Hotel_Co._v._Parrish
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Established precedent for economic regulation
|
| gptkbp:state |
gptkb:New_York
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Taft_Court
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|