Statements (57)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:aftermath |
Strengthened press freedom
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Analyzed in constitutional law courses
Implications for state censorship laws Relevant in discussions of free speech Used as case study in media law |
| gptkbp:case_number |
Documented in legal archives
1 U. S. 241 (1931) Part of legal history of the United States |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Unanimous decision
Set precedent for future cases Majority opinion emphasized free press Declared unconstitutional prior restraint laws Influenced media practices in the U. S. Ruling against censorship Victory for Jay Near |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
gptkb:Landmark_case_in_First_Amendment_law
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:Constitution
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Influenced future First Amendment cases
Foundation for modern media law |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 1, 1931 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black |
| gptkbp:doctrine |
Doctrine of prior restraint
|
| gptkbp:economic_policy |
Impact on public policy regarding media
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Great Depression era
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Pivotal moment in First Amendment history
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Near v. Minnesota
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
Civil Liberties Union
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:State_of_Minnesota
Jay Near |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Subsequent Supreme Court rulings
283 U. S. 697 (1931) |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Judicial review of state actions
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
Legacy in First Amendment jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Framework for press freedom
Influenced judicial attitudes towards press freedom |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Prior restraint
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
No prior restraint on publication
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
State Attorney General
A. J. H. Mc Carthy |
| gptkbp:legislation |
Media law reforms
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Struck down Minnesota law
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Freedom of the press
Established legal precedent for press rights |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Charles_Evans_Hughes
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Increased awareness of press rights
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:New_York_Times_Co._v._United_States
gptkb:Schenck_v._United_States gptkb:Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Examined in law reviews
|
| gptkbp:significance |
First Amendment protection of press
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._New_York_Times_Co.
gptkb:Justice_Rufus_W._Peckham |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|