|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
January 13, 2014
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
13-104
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 26, 2014
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Influenced future interpretations of recess appointments.
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:National_Labor_Relations_Board
gptkb:Noel_Canning
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
573 U. S. 513 (2014)
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
Recess appointments
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
The Supreme Court ruled that the President's recess appointment power is limited.
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Limits on executive power regarding appointments.
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
gptkb:National_Labor_Relations_Act
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_D._C._Circuit
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|