National Judicial Appointments Commission case
GPTKB entity
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:challenges |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_Bar_Association
Article_124 Article_124A Article_217 |
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
debate on judicial appointments
support for collegium system criticism_of_NJAC |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| gptkbp:future_plans |
impact on future appointments
ongoing debates on judiciary potential for new legislation judicial_reforms_in_India |
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
legal journals
law reviews constitutional law discussions |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
National Judicial Appointments Commission case
|
| gptkbp:impact |
appointment of judges
|
| gptkbp:involves |
judicial appointments
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_R.F._Nariman
gptkb:Justice_J.S._Khehar gptkb:Justice_Madan_B._Lokur gptkb:Justice_Kurian_Joseph judicial activism judicial restraint Justice_A.K._Goel |
| gptkbp:judgingCriteria |
October 16, 2015
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
collegium system
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Attorney_General_of_India
Senior Advocates |
| gptkbp:legislation |
Judges Appointment and Transfer Bill, 2014
National_Judicial_Appointments_Commission_Act,_2014 |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive coverage
editorials and opinions |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
separation of powers
executive influence transparency in appointments accountability of judiciary |
| gptkbp:outcome |
struck_down_the_NJAC_Act
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
judicial review
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
Constitution of India
|
| gptkbp:significance |
judicial independence
|
| gptkbp:viewpoint |
judicial independence globally
comparative judicial systems |
| gptkbp:year |
2015
|