Statements (24)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
(2016) 5 SCC 1
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:India
|
| gptkbp:date |
2015-10-16
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
NJAC case
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:J._Chelameswar
gptkb:J._S._Khehar gptkb:Kurian_Joseph Adarsh Kumar Goel Madan B. Lokur |
| gptkbp:leader |
H. L. Dattu
|
| gptkbp:officialName |
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs Union of India
|
| gptkbp:popularFor |
gptkb:NJAC_case
|
| gptkbp:powers |
5-judge Constitution Bench
|
| gptkbp:reasoning |
Violated independence of judiciary
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:National_Judicial_Appointments_Commission
99th Constitutional Amendment Collegium system |
| gptkbp:subject |
Constitutionality of National Judicial Appointments Commission
|
| gptkbp:verdict |
NJAC Act and 99th Constitutional Amendment struck down as unconstitutional
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Indian_Judiciary
gptkb:Fali_Nariman |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|