National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra

GPTKB entity

Statements (35)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs gptkb:NIFLA_v._Becerra
gptkbp:appealsTo gptkb:Ninth_Circuit_Court_of_Appeals
gptkbp:arguedDate March 20, 2018
gptkbp:category United States Free Speech Clause case law
2018 in United States case law
Abortion in the United States Supreme Court
gptkbp:citation 585 U.S. ___ (2018)
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkbp:date June 26, 2018
gptkbp:decision Reversed and remanded
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:docketNumber 16-1140
gptkbp:heldBy California law requiring crisis pregnancy centers to provide certain notices likely violates the First Amendment
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
gptkbp:impact Limited state regulation of speech by crisis pregnancy centers
gptkbp:joinedBy gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkbp:joinedDissentBy gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkbp:numberOfIssues gptkb:California_Reproductive_FACT_Act
gptkbp:originatedIn gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_California
gptkbp:petitioner gptkb:National_Institute_of_Family_and_Life_Advocates
gptkbp:relatedLegislation gptkb:California_Reproductive_FACT_Act
gptkbp:response gptkb:United_States_Senator
gptkb:Xavier_Becerra
gptkbp:subject gptkb:First_Amendment
Freedom of speech
Abortion
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:First_Amendment
gptkbp:bfsLayer 5