National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
GPTKB entity
Properties (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Reinforced First Amendment protections.
Impact on reproductive health policies. Significant for reproductive rights. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 16-1140.
constitutional law case. |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Potential changes in state laws regarding pregnancy centers.
|
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 ruling.
Ruling emphasized the importance of free speech. Significant ruling on free speech. |
| gptkbp:date |
June 26, 2018
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
Involved_challenges_to_California_law.
Originated_from_California_law. |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced state regulations on pregnancy centers.
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Kagan
Justice Breyer Majority opinion emphasized free speech. Influenced future litigation on similar issues. Judicial outcome favored free speech. Justice Alito. Justice Gorsuch. Reviewed_by_the_Supreme_Court. |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Analyzed First Amendment implications.
Analyzed implications for state laws. |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Set a precedent for similar cases.
Implications for future legislation. Strengthened First Amendment protections. Alliance Defending Freedom. Debate over state regulation of speech. Established precedent for similar cases. Involves free speech and compelled speech. Part of ongoing debates on reproductive rights. Reaffirmed free speech rights. Part of the legal framework surrounding reproductive rights. Part of broader legal debates on reproductive health. First_Amendment_rights Compelled_speech_violates_the_First_Amendment. Invalidated_certain_state_requirements. |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Used as a case study in law schools.
Significant for legal precedents. 138 S. Ct. 2361 (2018) Important for crisis pregnancy centers. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruled in favor of the petitioners
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:National_Institute_of_Family_and_Life_Advocates
gptkb:Xavier_Becerra |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
NIFLA_v._Becerra_established_protections_for_crisis_pregnancy_centers.
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Mixed reactions from advocacy groups.
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey.
Whole_Woman's_Health_v._Hellerstedt. |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
California_Reproductive_Freedom,_Accountability,_Comprehensive_Care,_and_Transparency_Act
|
| gptkbp:state |
California.
|