National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
GPTKB entity
Statements (57)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analyzed in law schools
examined state interests vs. individual rights affects future legislation on reproductive health important for non-profits |
| gptkbp:case_number |
available in legal archives
lower court ruling overturned 16-1140 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
reaffirmed constitutional protections
majority opinion favored free speech shapes public policy debates affects similar cases nationwide ruled against compelled speech significant victory for pro-life advocates struck down parts of the law unconstitutional regulation |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
landmark case for reproductive rights
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
influences state regulations on pregnancy centers
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:date |
March 20, 2018
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
dissent focused on women's rights |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
16-1140
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 26, 2018
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
|
| gptkbp:impact |
abortion counseling regulations
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:National_Institute_of_Family_and_Life_Advocates
gptkb:Xavier_Becerra |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
cited in legal discussions
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
5-4 decision
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:California_Reproductive_Freedom,_Accountability,_Comprehensive_Care,_and_Transparency_Act
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
First Amendment jurisprudence
upheld free speech rights |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
First Amendment rights
free speech vs. state regulation |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
protection of crisis pregnancy centers
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:California_Attorney_General's_Office
gptkb:Alliance_Defending_Freedom First Amendment implications |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:California_Assembly_Bill_775
|
| gptkbp:material |
challenged California law
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruled in favor of National Institute of Family and Life Advocates
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:NIFLA_v._Becerra
affirms rights of non-profit organizations |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
mixed reactions
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey
gptkb:Whole_Woman's_Health_v._Hellerstedt gptkb:NIFLA_v._Becerra_II |
| gptkbp:significance |
free speech protections
affirms free speech rights of crisis pregnancy centers |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
gptkb:Samuel_Alito |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|