Statements (76)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
January 13, 2014
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Relevant to discussions on executive power.
Affected future appointments by the President. Analyzed the limits of executive authority. |
| gptkbp:case_number |
12-1281
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Unanimous decision.
Recess appointments made during pro forma sessions are invalid. Reversed lower court ruling. The Supreme Court ruled against the NLRB. The ruling limited the President's recess appointment powers. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Significant for constitutional law.
Historical context of executive appointments. Important for understanding separation of powers. Judicial significance in labor law. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Administrative law case.
Focused on the interpretation of 'recess'. |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Significant impact on labor relations.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 26, 2014 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:None |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 26, 2014
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
Potential changes to executive appointment strategies.
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
First major Supreme Court case on recess appointments in decades.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
NLRB v. Noel Canning
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Labor relations
Executive appointments Influenced future cases on executive authority. presidential recess appointments |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:National_Labor_Relations_Board
gptkb:Noel_Canning |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
573 U. S. 513 (2014)
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
Judgment delivered by the Supreme Court.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Judicial review of executive actions.
Subject to judicial review. |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:U._S._Constitution,_Article_II,_Section_2
Details of the legal context surrounding the case. Context of executive power and labor law. U. S. Constitution, Article II. |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Details of the legal framework established.
Details of the judicial impact on labor relations. Influenced executive branch practices. Judicial outcome affected labor board operations. Part of the broader legal framework governing appointments. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Recess appointments
Established principles regarding executive appointments. Debated among legal experts. Recess appointments clause |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Recess appointments made during pro forma sessions are invalid.
Details of the legal outcome discussed. |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Examined the scope of presidential powers.
Judicial analysis of executive powers. U. S. Solicitor General. |
| gptkbp:legislation |
National Labor Relations Act.
|
| gptkbp:material |
Originated from a labor dispute.
|
| gptkbp:modern_relevance |
Significant in labor law.
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
The Court ruled that the President's recess appointment power is limited.
invalidated NLRB appointments Recess appointments were invalid |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Set a precedent for future recess appointment cases.
Set judicial precedent for future cases. Limits on executive power Limits on executive power regarding appointments. |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer
9-0 Controversial among legal scholars. |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:NLRB_v._Canning
gptkb:NLRB_v._New_Vista_Nursing_and_Rehabilitation |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:National_Labor_Relations_Board
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified the interpretation of the Recess Appointments Clause.
Clarified scope of presidential recess appointment power |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2014
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|