|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
Judicial independence
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
(2016) 5 SCC 1
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:India
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
NJAC Act case
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Reinstated collegium system for appointment of judges
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
Justice J. S. Khehar
|
|
gptkbp:judgmentDate
|
2015-10-16
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs Union of India
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014
99th Constitutional Amendment
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_Advocates-on-Record_Association
|
|
gptkbp:popularFor
|
NJAC judgment
|
|
gptkbp:powers
|
5
|
|
gptkbp:reasoning
|
Violated basic structure of the Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:National_Judicial_Appointments_Commission
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Union_of_India
|
|
gptkbp:upheldDoctrine
|
Collegium system
|
|
gptkbp:verdict
|
NJAC Act and 99th Constitutional Amendment declared unconstitutional
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Indian_Judiciary
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|