Statements (113)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:battle
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:John_F._Dulles
|
| gptkbp:aims_to |
nuclear war
|
| gptkbp:based_on |
deterrence theory
|
| gptkbp:constructed_in |
gptkb:Monarch
|
| gptkbp:examines |
gptkb:military_unit
strategic studies international relations theory security studies defense policy experts defense policy analysis nuclear strategy discussions international security studies strategic studies scholars defense literature |
| gptkbp:has_impact_on |
gptkb:Embassy
|
| gptkbp:has_influence_on |
defense policies
nuclear policy |
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
gptkb:academic_circles
political discourse political scientists |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Mutual Assured Destruction
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:weapon
|
| gptkbp:is_a |
gptkb:military_unit
gptkb:concept strategic doctrine concept in international relations strategic military policy |
| gptkbp:is_associated_with |
Cold War tensions
nuclear proliferation strategic stability |
| gptkbp:is_challenged_by |
new technologies
emerging threats non-state actors disruptive technologies new military technologies non-proliferation efforts emerging global threats new military doctrines cyber warfare threats new geopolitical realities |
| gptkbp:is_considered |
a deterrent strategy
a controversial topic a key element of national security a controversial doctrine a controversial aspect of international relations. a foundational concept in military strategy a key element of U. S. defense policy a foundational principle of deterrence a key aspect of military strategy |
| gptkbp:is_criticized_for |
lack of transparency
moral implications ethical dilemmas potential for escalation humanitarian concerns lack of effectiveness peace activists lack of ethical considerations escalation risks potential for miscalculation its reliance on fear its implications for global security creating a false sense of security encouraging arms race inability to prevent rogue states potential for catastrophic failure risk of accidental war |
| gptkbp:is_discussed_in |
gptkb:international_forums
gptkb:Embassy military literature policy debates security conferences |
| gptkbp:is_explored_in |
gptkb:political_science_literature
fictional works |
| gptkbp:is_implemented_in |
gptkb:Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty
Nuclear Posture Review |
| gptkbp:is_influenced_by |
gptkb:historical_event
technological advancements historical precedents political ideologies |
| gptkbp:is_linked_to |
military alliances
Cold War tensions strategic deterrence global security issues geopolitical strategies nuclear strategy debates balance of power theory |
| gptkbp:is_opposed_by |
disarmament advocates
|
| gptkbp:is_part_of |
gptkb:defense_strategies
nuclear strategy nuclear deterrence theory nuclear arms control discussions |
| gptkbp:is_promoted_by |
gptkb:Monarch
gptkb:United_States |
| gptkbp:is_reflected_in |
strategic partnerships
national defense strategies military doctrines strategic military planning military spending nuclear strategy documents |
| gptkbp:is_related_to |
gptkb:military_conflict
nuclear deterrence strategic stability |
| gptkbp:is_supported_by |
gptkb:government_agency
defense analysts military strategists military planners some military leaders realist theorists some defense analysts |
| gptkbp:led_to |
nuclear arms control agreements
|
| gptkbp:requires |
second-strike capability
|