|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
March 20, 2017
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:582_U.S._____(2017)
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 23, 2017
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
15-214
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
When determining if a regulatory taking has occurred, courts must consider the property as a whole, including adjacent parcels under common ownership.
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Fifth_Amendment
regulatory takings
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
St. Croix River, Wisconsin
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:opinionAnnouncementDate
|
June 23, 2017
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
Murr family
|
|
gptkbp:precedentSet
|
multi-parcel analysis in takings cases
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Penn_Central_Transportation_Co._v._New_York_City
gptkb:Lucas_v._South_Carolina_Coastal_Council
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:St._Croix_County
gptkb:State_of_Wisconsin
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
property rights
land use regulation
|
|
gptkbp:website
|
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-214_f1gj.pdf
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:137_S._Ct._1730
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
8
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Murr v. Wisconsin
|