Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	April 24, 1950
gptkbp:citation	339 U.S. 306
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date	1950 June 5, 1950
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:docketNumber	120
gptkbp:fullName	Mullane, Special Guardian, et al. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., et al.
gptkbp:heldBy	Notice by publication is not sufficient for beneficiaries whose addresses are known; due process requires notice reasonably calculated to apprise interested parties.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
gptkbp:legalSubject	gptkb:Due_Process Jurisdiction Notice
gptkbp:location	gptkb:New_York
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Robert_H._Jackson
gptkbp:predecessor	notice requirements in legal proceedings
gptkbp:referencedIn	Constitutional Law Trust Law Civil Procedure
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Procedural_Due_Process
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6