|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
487 U.S. 654
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:courtTerm
|
gptkb:Rehnquist_Court
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1988-06-29
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:Theodore_B._Olson
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
87-1279
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Alexia_Morrison,_Independent_Counsel_v._Theodore_B._Olson,_et_al.
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The Independent Counsel Act does not violate the separation of powers principle.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Morrison v. Olson
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Article_II_of_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:Appointments_Clause
separation of powers
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:notableFor
|
Scalia's lone dissent
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Alexia_Morrison
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
cases on independent counsel
|
|
gptkbp:relatedLegislation
|
gptkb:Ethics_in_Government_Act
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|