gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
gptkbp:citation
|
588 U.S. ___ (2019)
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 27, 2019
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
18-6210
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The exigent-circumstances exception generally permits a blood test without a warrant when a driver is unconscious and cannot be given a breath test.
|
gptkbp:historicalPeriod
|
gptkb:State_v._Mitchell,_383_Wis._2d_192,_914_N.W.2d_151_(2018)
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Mitchell v. Wisconsin
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
warrantless blood draw
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
gptkbp:numberOfIssues
|
Whether a statute authorizing a blood draw from an unconscious motorist provides an exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement.
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Gerald_P._Mitchell
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:State_of_Wisconsin
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:2019_in_United_States_case_law
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|