|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
569 U.S. 141
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
April 17, 2013
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
11-1425
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
Missouri v. Tyler G. McNeely
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The natural metabolization of alcohol in the bloodstream does not present a per se exigency that justifies an exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement for nonconsensual blood testing in drunk-driving investigations.
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:blood_test
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
drunk driving
warrantless search
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
gptkb:Missouri
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:State_of_Missouri
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
gptkb:Birchfield_v._North_Dakota
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Schmerber_v._California
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
Tyler G. McNeely
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
search and seizure
exigent circumstances
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Schmerber_v._California
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Missouri v. McNeely
|