Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
December 6, 1919
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Study in federalism and environmental law
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:No._19
Part of early 20th-century legal battles |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Majority opinion favored federal authority
Established federal treaty enforcement authority U. S. prevailed over Missouri |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Significant in environmental law history
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:Constitution
|
| gptkbp:court |
Chief Justice Edward Douglass White
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
January 10, 1920 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Holmes
Limited federal power interpretation |
| gptkbp:doctrine |
Doctrine of preemption
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
State vs. federal power dynamics
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
gptkb:Post-World_War_I_treaties
|
| gptkbp:historical_impact |
Influenced future environmental treaties
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Missouri v. Holland
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced environmental law
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
International law principles
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:State_of_Missouri |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
252 U. S. 416
|
| gptkbp:judges |
7-2
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Judicial review of state laws
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:Migratory_Bird_Treaty_Act
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Framework for treaty law
Influenced judicial interpretation of treaties |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Treaty power
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Federal law prevails over state law
Analysis of federal vs. state authority Federal law upheld |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
gptkb:Supremacy_Clause
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Examined treaty enforcement
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
Migratory Bird Treaty
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
U. S. government can regulate migratory birds
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Federal authority over state laws
Set legal precedent for future cases Federal government authority over wildlife conservation |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Shipp
Missouri v. Holland II |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Debates on federalism
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Affirmed federal supremacy in treaty implementation
Set precedent for federal treaty power |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1920
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Edward_Douglass_White
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|