Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980)

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	1981 SCR (1) 206 AIR 1980 SC 1789
gptkbp:country	gptkb:India
gptkbp:date	1980
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
gptkbp:heldBy	Judicial review is part of basic structure Limited power of Parliament to amend Constitution Sections 4 and 55 of the 42nd Amendment Act are unconstitutional
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980)
gptkbp:impact	Limited Parliament's power to amend the Constitution Reinforced the role of judicial review Strengthened the Basic Structure Doctrine
gptkbp:judge	gptkb:A._C._Gupta gptkb:N._L._Untwalia gptkb:P._N._Bhagwati gptkb:P._S._Kailasam gptkb:Y._V._Chandrachud
gptkbp:language	English
gptkbp:leader	gptkb:Y._V._Chandrachud
gptkbp:legalIssue	gptkb:Judicial_Review gptkb:Basic_Structure_Doctrine Amendment of the Constitution
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:Minerva_Mills_Ltd.
gptkbp:powers	5 judges
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:42nd_Amendment_of_the_Constitution_of_India gptkb:Kesavananda_Bharati_v._State_of_Kerala
gptkbp:response	gptkb:Union_of_India
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:Parliamentary_Sovereignty Separation of Powers Constitutional Law Judicial Review in India
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Article_31C
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6