Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
GPTKB entity
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
The case was appealed to the Supreme Court.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
2016/3/4/2016/3/4.
Originated from a High Court ruling. Involved legal arguments about the Royal Prerogative. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Influenced subsequent Brexit legislation.
The Supreme Court ruled 8-3 in favor of Miller. The Supreme Court's decision was published. The case was pivotal in the Brexit process. The case was widely discussed in legal circles. The ruling was seen as a victory for parliamentary democracy. The ruling clarified the limits of executive power. The ruling was a key moment in UK constitutional law. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Significant for constitutional law in the UK.
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Public law case.
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Affected the timeline of Brexit negotiations.
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
January 24, 2017
|
| gptkbp:government_response |
The government had to draft a bill for parliamentary approval.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced the process of the UK's withdrawal from the EU.
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
The government must seek parliamentary approval before triggering Article 50.
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lady_Hale
gptkb:Lord_Wilson gptkb:Lord_Thomas gptkb:Lord_Hughes gptkb:Lord_Neuberger gptkb:Lord_Carnwath gptkb:Lord_Mance gptkb:Lord_Reed |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Involved issues of constitutional law.
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
The ruling was a landmark decision.
The ruling reinforced the role of Parliament. |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Parliamentary sovereignty.
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Miller was represented by David Pannick.
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
The court ruled in favor of Miller.
Confirmed the necessity of parliamentary approval. |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Set a precedent for parliamentary sovereignty.
|
| gptkbp:propulsion |
gptkb:Gina_Miller
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Generated significant public and media interest.
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
R (on the application of Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
R (on the application of Cherry) v Advocate General for Scotland. |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Brexit
|
| gptkbp:responds_to |
gptkb:Secretary_of_State_for_Exiting_the_European_Union
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Constitutional law regarding the prerogative powers of the government.
Highlighted the role of Parliament in the Brexit process. |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Judicature
gptkb:Baroness_Hale |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|