|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:UK_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:application
|
gptkb:Gina_Miller
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:[2017]_UKSC_5
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2017-01-24
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Lord_Clarke
gptkb:Lord_Hughes
gptkb:Lord_Reed
gptkb:Lord_Carnwath
|
|
gptkbp:importantFor
|
Landmark constitutional case in UK law
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
Brexit
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Lord_Neuberger
|
|
gptkbp:mediaCoverage
|
Extensive national and international media coverage
|
|
gptkbp:numberOfIssues
|
Whether the UK Government could trigger Article 50 TEU without an act of Parliament
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Miller_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Exiting_the_European_Union
|
|
gptkbp:panelType
|
11 Justices
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
Parliamentary sovereignty in Brexit process
|
|
gptkbp:relatedLegislation
|
gptkb:European_Communities_Act_1972
gptkb:European_Union_(Notification_of_Withdrawal)_Act_2017
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:R_(Miller)_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Exiting_the_European_Union_[2016]_EWHC_2768_(Admin)
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Secretary_of_State_for_Exiting_the_European_Union
|
|
gptkbp:result
|
Parliamentary approval required to trigger Article 50
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:R_(on_the_application_of_Miller)_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Exiting_the_European_Union
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
[2017] UKSC 5
|